|
Kline & Specter, P.C.
Pharmaceutical Litigation Attorneys
Celebrex Claim Lawyers
Firm Profile
In 1995, Tom
Kline and Shanin
Specter left a major Philadelphia law firm and started their own
practice, opening an office on the top floor of a building in Center
City with one associate attorney and four staffers.
Today, Kline & Specter, P.C. occupies six floors of
the same building at 1525 Locust St. with an army of more than 30 top
notch attorneys, a staff exceeding 100 and a reputation as not only
the leading plaintiffs firm in the Philadelphia region but one of the
best in the United States.
Accolades and honors have followed. As The Legal Intelligencer
wrote in its June 21, 2004 edition:
“Along with partner Tom Kline, Shanin Specter left The Beasley
Firm nearly a decade ago and now sits atop what many view as the most
powerful plaintiffs firm ... with countless seven figure verdicts and
settlements to the firm.”
Kline & Specter has attracted the best of the best lawyers.
Six attorneys at the firm were selected recently as among “The
Best Attorneys in Pennsylvania” by Super Lawyers 2004 magazine,
with Tom Kline the No. 1 vote-getter among some 34,000 lawyers in the
state. (See Super Lawyers
2004, Lawyer Profiles.) The
firm has four lawyers who also previously practiced medicine (see Doctor/Lawyer
Team) as well as those with expertise in various facets of complex
personal injury, class action and mass tort litigation.
The firm and its lawyers have won an unsurpassed number
of major settlements and record-setting jury verdicts throughout the
country.
Back in the early 1980s, Tom Kline and Shanin Specter began
trying pharmaceutical products liability cases. Kline won the largest
compensatory jury verdict – $5.1 million – in the Dalkon
Shield mass tort litigation against A.H. Robins Co. in 1983. Specter
won major victories involving the arthritis drug Oraflex, manufactured
by Eli Lilly. Kline followed with settlements in the Selacryn (hypertension
drug) litigation against SmithKline. He then achieved multiple million-dollar
verdicts in Bendectin cases, including a $19.2 million verdict in the
Blum v. Merrell Dow
case, exposing the company’s improper drug testing and reporting.
The firm and its lawyers have achieved large settlements
and leadership positions in litigation involving asbestos, Baycol, Fen-Phen and
PPA. Kline &
Specter currently is leading the way in litigation involving other pharmaceuticals,
including Vioxx, Bextra,
Remicade, Crestor, Atypical Antipsychotic
medications (Zyprexa, Risperdal,
Clozaril), Lotronex, Propulsid,
Ephedra, Prempro and Serzone.
The firm has won many outstanding verdicts and settlements.
In a notable case tried in Reno, Nev., Specter achieved a $153 million
product liability verdict against Ford Motor Company (see The White Case),
among the largest such verdicts in the nation. Back home in Philadelphia,
Kline won a $51 million jury award in a celebrated case (Hall
v SEPTA) against SEPTA in which a young boy’s foot was torn
off in a subway escalator. (see Notable
Cases)
Kline & Specter has won a stream of seven- and eight-figure verdicts
in medical malpractice cases. (see Major
Victories) Among them was a $33.1 million Montgomery County jury
verdict in a missed-diagnosis breast cancer case (Welteroth);
a $49 million Philadelphia verdict in a hospital-error case (Caruso); a $19.9
million verdict in a Delaware state case in which a patient was accosted
in her hospital bed (Sparber); a $25
million verdict for the family of a young doctor who died following
a routine fertility procedure (Matteo); a $20.8
million verdict for a podiatrist who lost her foot because of errors
in unrelated treatment (Young); a $20 million
verdict for a Penn student brain injured as a result of ICU negligence
(Gallagher); a
$19.1 million verdict in Luzerne County for a construction worker struck
by a van while she was at a roadside worksite (McManamon);
and two verdicts of $15 million each involving surgical errors that
injured children (Sears and Borkowski).
In a premises liability case, Specter won a $24 million
verdict for an injury resulting from a drowning at an apartment complex
swimming pool (Weightman),
while the firm secured a $36.4 million settlement in September 2003
from the Motiva Enterprises
refinery in Delaware County, where a worker was killed. In the Motiva
case, Kline & Specter established a new gold standard for investigating
a case, reviewing 40,000 documents and hiring 14 experts in a year-long,
$750,000 probe that uncovered the real cause – not what the company
had reported – of their client’s death.
Beyond the courtroom victories, the work of the firm and
its highly publicized cases have also brought about change – for
the better. Cases have resulted in improved training for nurses, stricter
rules for officers who drive city police cars, upgrading of dilapidated
mass-transit escalators in the SEPTA system and – in a case featured
on ABC’s 20/20 (Mahoney) –
federal government action seeking the recall of 7.4 million powerful,
defective BB air rifles. Another case (Lackman), which
was featured on ABC’s Nightline, helped lead to improved
mammogram testing practices for women.
Kline & Specter also prosecuted a highly publicized
case involving injury
to a person's reputation. In a September 2004 defamation suit,
the firm obtained an unambiguous apology and retraction as well as the
30-day suspension of Philadelphia radio personality Howard Eskin. Infinity
Broadcasting, his employer, also made a "substantial" payment to settle
the lawsuit filed on behalf of noted attorney Richard Sprague, who
claimed Eskin had defamed him on the air."


Celebrex Side Effects Claims Attorneys
Call 1-888-846-9925 Contact Us
Home | Celebrex Treatment & Side Effects | Celebrex Description & Uses | Celebrex Warnings & Side Effects | Celebrex & Heart Attacks | Celebrex Lawsuits & Claims | Celebrex Questions | Celebrex Online Resources | Celebrex News | Find A Celebrex Lawyer | Firm Profile | Contact Us | Links
* Celebrex Litigation Attorenys Disclaimer:
The information on this site about Celebrex side effects litigation
is not intended to be or to replace legal or medical advice. Consult
a pharmaceutical litigation attorney for individual advice regarding
your own legal situation. Confer with your doctor or other qualified
medical professional before taking any drug and before changing your
own personal healthcare regimen.
|